Desember 18, 2010

President Obama’s statement on the Afghanistan-Pakistan Annual Review


U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a statement on the Afghanistan-Pakistan Annual Review from the White House Briefing Room with Vice President Joe Biden (L) and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton looking on in Washington December 16, 2010. The review said "notable operational gains" had been made and Taliban momentum had been "arrested" in much of the country and reversed in some areas, but any gains were fragile and reversible. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque


December 16, 2010 (KATAKAMI / WHITEHOUSE.GOV) ---- THE PRESIDENT: Good morning, everybody. When I announced our new strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan last December, I directed my national security team to regularly assess our efforts and to review our progress after one year. That’s what we’ve done consistently over the course of the past 12 months —- in weekly updates from the field, in monthly meetings with my national security team, and in my frequent consultations with our Afghan, Pakistani and coalition partners. And that’s what we’ve done as part of our annual review, which is now complete.

I want to thank Secretary Clinton and Secretary Gates for their leadership. Since Joint Chief of Staff Chairman, Admiral Mullen, is in Afghanistan, I’m pleased that we’re joined by Vice Chairman, General Cartwright.

Our efforts also reflect the dedication of Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, whose memory we honor and whose work we’ll continue. Indeed, the tributes to Richard that have poured in from around the globe speak to both the enormous impact of his life and to the broad international commitment to our shared efforts in this critical region.

I have spoken with President Karzai of Afghanistan as well as President Zardari of Pakistan and discussed our findings and the way forward together. Today, I want to update the American people on our review —- our assessment of where we stand and areas where we need to do better. I want to be clear. This continues to be a very difficult endeavor. But I can report that thanks to the extraordinary service of our troops and civilians on the ground, we are on track to achieve our goals.

It’s important to remember why we remain in Afghanistan. It was Afghanistan where al Qaeda plotted the 9/11 attacks that murdered 3,000 innocent people. It is the tribal regions along the Afghan-Pakistan border from which terrorists have launched more attacks against our homeland and our allies. And if an even wider insurgency were to engulf Afghanistan, that would give al Qaeda even more space to plan these attacks.

And that’s why, from the start, I’ve been very clear about our core goal. It’s not to defeat every last threat to the security of Afghanistan, because, ultimately, it is Afghans who must secure their country. And it’s not nation-building, because it is Afghans who must build their nation. Rather, we are focused on disrupting, dismantling and defeating al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and preventing its capacity to threaten America and our allies in the future.

In pursuit of our core goal we are seeing significant progress. Today, al Qaeda’s senior leadership in the border region of Afghanistan and Pakistan is under more pressure than at any point since they fled Afghanistan nine years ago. Senior leaders have been killed. It’s harder for them to recruit; it’s harder for them to travel; it’s harder for them to train; it’s harder for them to plot and launch attacks. In short, al Qaeda is hunkered down. It will take time to ultimately defeat al Qaeda, and it remains a ruthless and resilient enemy bent on attacking our country. But make no mistake -- we are going to remain relentless in disrupting and dismantling that terrorist organization.

In Afghanistan, we remain focused on the three areas of our strategy: our military effort to break the Taliban’s momentum and train Afghan forces so they can take the lead; our civilian effort to promote effective governance and development; and regional cooperation, especially with Pakistan, because our strategy has to succeed on both sides of the border.

Indeed, for the first time in years, we’ve put in place the strategy and the resources that our efforts in Afghanistan demand. And because we’ve ended our combat mission in Iraq, and brought home nearly 100,000 of our troops from Iraq, we’re in a better position to give our forces in Afghanistan the support and equipment they need to achieve their missions. And our drawdown in Iraq also means that today there are tens of thousands fewer Americans deployed in harm’s way than when I took office.

With those additional forces in Afghanistan, we are making considerable gains toward our military objectives. The additional military and civilian personnel that I ordered in Afghanistan are now in place, along with additional forces from our coalition, which has grown to 49 nations. Along with our Afghan partners, we’ve gone on the offensive, targeting the Taliban and its leaders and pushing them out of their strongholds.

As I said when I visited our troops in Afghanistan earlier this month, progress comes slowly and at a very high price in the lives of our men and women in uniform. In many places, the gains we’ve made are still fragile and reversible. But there is no question we are clearing more areas from Taliban control and more Afghans are reclaiming their communities.

To ensure Afghans can take responsibility, we continue to focus on training. Targets for the growth of Afghan security forces are being met. And because of the contributions of additional trainers from our coalition partners, I’m confident we will continue to meet our goals.

I would add that much of this progress —- the speed with which our troops deployed this year, the increase in recruits -- in recruiting and training of Afghan forces, and the additional troops and trainers from other nations —- much of this is the result of us having sent a clear signal that we will begin the transition of responsibility to Afghans and start reducing American forces next July.

This sense of urgency also helped galvanize the coalition around the goals that we agreed to at the recent NATO summit in Lisbon —- that we are moving toward a new phase in Afghanistan, a transition to full Afghan lead for security that will begin early next year and will conclude in 2014, even as NATO maintains a long-term commitment to training and advising Afghan forces. Now, our review confirms, however, that for these security gains to be sustained over time, there is an urgent need for political and economic progress in Afghanistan.

Over the past year, we’ve dramatically increased our civilian presence, with more diplomats and development experts working alongside our troops, risking their lives and partnering with Afghans. Going forward, there must be a continued focus on the delivery of basic services, as well as transparency and accountability. We will also fully support an Afghan political process that includes reconciliation with those Taliban who break ties with al Qaeda, renounce violence and accept the Afghan constitution. And we will forge a new strategic partnership with Afghanistan next year, so that we make it clear that the United States is committed to the long-term security and development of the Afghan people.

Finally, we will continue to focus on our relationship with Pakistan. Increasingly, the Pakistani government recognizes that terrorist networks in its border regions are a threat to all our countries, especially Pakistan. We’ve welcomed major Pakistani offensives in the tribal regions. We will continue to help strengthen Pakistanis’ capacity to root out terrorists. Nevertheless, progress has not come fast enough. So we will continue to insist to Pakistani leaders that terrorist safe havens within their borders must be dealt with.

At the same time, we need to support the economic and political development that is critical to Pakistan’s future. As part of our strategic dialogue with Pakistan, we will work to deepen trust and cooperation. We’ll speed up our investment in civilian institutions and projects that improve the lives of Pakistanis. We’ll intensify our efforts to encourage closer cooperation between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

And, next year, I look forward to an exchange of visits, including my visit to Pakistan, because the United States is committed to an enduring partnership that helps deliver improved security, development, and justice for the Pakistani people.

Again, none of these challenges that I’ve outlined will be easy. There are more difficult days ahead. But as a nation, we can draw strength from the service of our fellow Americans.

On my recent visit to Afghanistan, I visited a medical unit and pinned Purple Hearts on some of our wounded warriors. I met with a platoon that had just lost six of their teammates. Despite the tough fight, despite all their sacrifice, they continue to stand up for our security and for our values that we hold so dear.

We’re going to have to continue to stand up. We’ll continue to give our brave troops and civilians the strategy and resources they need to succeed. We will never waver from our goal of disrupting, dismantling, and ultimately defeating al Qaeda. We will forge enduring partnerships with people who are committed to progress and to peace. And we will continue to do everything in our power to ensure the security and the safety of the American people.

So, with that, Vice President Biden and myself will depart, and I’m going to turn it over to Secretaries Clinton, Gates, as well as Vice Chairman Cartwright, and they will be able to answer your questions and give you a more detailed briefing.

Thank you very much.


(*)

Desember 17, 2010

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev urges governors to build, support kindergartens


Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (2nd R) visits a kindergarten for children with special needs in Moscow on December 17, 2010. (Photo by DMITRY ASTAKHOV/AFP/Getty Images)



MOSCOW, December 17 (KATAKAMI / Itar-Tass) -- Russian President Dmitry Medvedev hopes that regional chiefs will give closer attention to the construction and support to kindergartens. He has made a statement at a visit to a kindergarten in Moscow. 

“Unfortunately, most of our kindergartens are not so good as yours; your kindergarten is a perfect one in the 
design and the equipment,” the president said. “I hope that a presidential visit is primarily a symbol of understanding to the problem of kindergartens and I hope that it is an example for governors,” he added.

Medvedev recalled that a long queue for children to be taken for care in the kindergartens is one of the most pressing problems, about which he stated in his state-of-the-nation address to the Federal Assembly. “I drew attention of the governors to this problem, because it is impossible to deal with this from Moscow,” he noted.
The president asked Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin, who attended a meeting between the president and the kindergarten personnel, to report about the situation with this problem in the Russian capital.

“Now 20,000 children are queuing for vacant seats in the kindergartens who make about five percent from all children,” the mayor said. “The problem is that these five percent live in highly populated districts, so, many children live particularly in newly built apartment blocks,” he added.

Some 83 kindergartens will be commissioned next year, but, according to the forecast, the queue may get twice longer over the birth rate growth, Sobyanin said.

“On the one hand, it is the problem and, on the other hand, a higher birth rate is what we are seeking for,” the president said.

During the conversation with kindergarten staffers Medvedev asked in detail about the problems they are facing and the types of work in the kindergartens. He gave special thanks to the pedagogues for their work with disabled children. “This sphere is difficult. Our schools do not educate such children frequently, moreover, our kindergartens do not do it either, so, what you are doing is good,” the president underlined. (*) 

British Foreign Secretary William Hague answers foreign policy questions on Twitter


William Hague

December 16, 2010 (KATAKAMI / FCO.GOV.UK) --- Foreign Secretary William Hague answered questions about his first six months at the Foreign Office on 16 December via Twitter.


The following questions were put to the Foreign Secretary@WilliamJHague by using the hashtag #foreignoffice.



Q. @BackS00N: RT @cliffsull: #FOREIGNOFFICE -Mr Hague -would you tell us the Foreign Offices stance on Gary #Mckinnon plaese ? #freegary


A. @BackS00N @cliffsull Home Secretary is currently reviewing the Gary Mckinnon case


Q. @curiousc:@WilliamJHague How you feel #wikileaks impacts on the #opendata agenda in the UK ?


A. @curiousc I support internet freedom. But doesn't extend to threatening national security by publishing illegally obtained documents


Q. @HKSkot1@WilliamJHague #foreignoffice was there anything in the Wikileaks material that was genuinely damaging rather than just mildly embarrassing?


A. @HKScot1 Wikileaks confuses need for transparency and accountability with irresponsible attempts to undermine government


Q.@citizen_sane: @WilliamJHague What impact do you think WikiLeaks will have on future UK diplomacy? #foreignoffice


A. @citizen_sane Important diplomats can advise candidly and in confidence. Ours do so and I want them to keep doing it.


Q. @tom5ash:@williamjhague Does defence cooperation with France undermine our relationship with the US or does it increase our influence? #foreignoffice


A. @tom5ash Treaty with France is about practical co-operation to increase military impact - doesnt replace Special Relationship


Q. @manatrue: #foreignoffice @WilliamJHague Are British courts not fit for purpose or is there another reason why #GaryMcKinnon is denied UK justice?


A. @manatrue @wildallison Mr Assange's extradition is rightly a matter for the courts


Q.@FHxoxo: @WilliamJHague what is being improve relations btw UK and Burma, a member of ASEAN, now that Aung San Suu Kyi is free? #foreignoffice


A. @FHxoxo Her release was long overdue. 2,200 other political prisoners remain behind bars. More progress is needed.


Q. @JoeThorpe1963: @WilliamJHague #foreignoffice the only foreign policy anyone that interests people is when will we get a referendum on #EU membership?


A. @JoeThorpe1963 We had a vote after we first joined. Our EU Referendum lock guarentees a popular vote on any further shifts of power


Q. @KevReillyCom: Do u think Julian Assange has risked/claimed any UK lifes with leaks or are you worried of any UK based leaks? #foreignoffice @WilliamJHague


A. @KevReillyCom Leaks can damage national security, and put lives at risk. They are in no one’s interest


Q. @KevReillyCom: Do the #foreignoffice intend to use social media (thinking Twitter/Google Latitude type locations) with it's LOCATE system? @WilliamJHague


A. @KevReillyCom We increasingly use social media for consular work & we are considering future options for LOCATE & public registration


Q. @si_smith: @WilliamJHague #foreignoffice William, is the unbalanced UK/US Extradition treaty going to be amended/changed/abandoned?


A. @si_smith We want to ensure that extradition is fair, balanced and in the interests of justice. Independent panel now reviewing


Q. @huwtaylor: @WilliamJHague Do you think that the European Arrest Warrants are being abused? #foreignoffice


A. @huwtaylor I do think there is a problem. The Home Office is reviewing how they work


Q. @benpopkid: @WilliamJHague when will you as foreign secretary make it easier for citizens such as myself to marry a non-EU resident?


A. @benpopkid This is a matter for the Home Office I am afraid. But I wish you all the best in your personal life


Q. @Pol_Hernanz: @williamjhague Your views please on European Citizens' Initiative #ECI, now accepted by #EP. Will it have any actual impact? #foreignoffice


A. @Pol_Hernanz Important to increase connection between people and the EU. If European Citizens Initiative does this, then good thing


Q. @bilalhassam: Question @WilliamJHague #foreignoffice Israel defies international law in building settlements when wil UK do something beyond empty threats


A. @bilalhassam Settlements undermine peace efforts & are illegal. UK acting to help build capacity of future Palestinian state


Q. @greeneyespy: @WilliamJHague #foreignoffice questions: were the #Pakistan floods a result of #climatechange & how important #Brazil to #climate diplomacy?


A. @greeneyespy We're seeing more extreme weather events across the world.Brazil is very important as is Mexico.They did a great job at Cancun


Q. @vickirowlands: @WilliamJHague What are you most proud of achieving/changing/doing since May 2010? #foreignoffice


A. @vickirowlands Starting to build the strategic relations Britain needs for the future and returning FCO to its proper place in government


Q. @WilliamJHague @UKinSriLanka #foreignoffice How would you describe how it has been to work on the relatship between the UK and Sri Lanka?


A. @johnfdrake Constructive meeting with FM Peiris in Oct. Called for lasting political settlement and inquiry on human rights abuses


Q. @MarkThomRees: @WilliamJHague Is Oil & Trade more important when dealing with countries than Human Rights, The Death Penalty & Gay Abuse? #ForeignOffice


A. @MarkThomRees No. Human rights are fundamental to this government - I am improving and strengthening our human rights work


Q. @WeLshRoGs: @WilliamJHague #foreignoffice How much did the foreign office pay for it's Christmas trees? Has it taken a leaf from the Treasury?


A. @WeLshRoGs We spent nothing on Christmas trees in London!


Q. PeterCampbell1: @WilliamJHague who has been the most interesting person you've met so far? #foreignoffice


A. @Petercampbell1 The young Afghan students I talked to in Herat in July


Q. @mikebettison: @WilliamJHague you have a very interesting job but you never tweet anything remotely interesting. Why not? #foreignoffice


A. @mikebettison I suspect those two observations are linked


Q. @KevReillyCom: Do you see Radical Islam in general as more organised than on 9/11? (not necessarily under the brand Al-Qaeda) #foreignoffice @WilliamJHague


A. @KevReillyCom AQ less organised than pre-9.11 but still a deadly threat. We and our partners are committed to reducing it


Q. @lewieashman: @williamjhague what counter terrorism measures are in place to stop what happened in Sweden happen in the UK? #foreignoffice


A. @lewieashman All relevant organisations in UK working together to address threat posed by terrorism


Q. @Chanell 82: @WilliamJHague: what approach will the fco be taking to address corruption in africa's elections and improve governance? #foreignoffice


A. @Chanell82 Improving governance and ensuring fair elections key part of our overseas aid and foreign policy


Q. @mattbjones: @WilliamJHague Has raising human rights concerns with foreign gov's proved harder than you thought, given economic situation? #foreignoffice


A. @mattbjones No. Our diplomats and Ministers raise human rights cases week by week across the world and will continue to so.






(*)

Desember 16, 2010

Boehner Appoints Rep. Kevin Brady as Vice Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee


House Speaker-elect US Representative John Boehner

 Please also visit : INDONESIAKATAKAMI.WORDPRESS.COM


Washington, Dec 15 (KATAKAMI / GOPLEADER.GOV) --- Speaker-designate John Boehner (R-OH) today announced the appointment of Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) as Vice Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee (JEC):

“Kevin Brady has been, and will continue to be, a leader in Republicans’ efforts to cut spending, rein in the size of government, and help small businesses create jobs, consistent with the GOP’s Pledge to America. His background as an advocate for small businesses and expertise on economic and trade policy will be key assets for our Conference as we develop solutions to grow our economy and create jobs for middle-class families. I look forward to working with him in his role as Vice Chairman.”

NOTE: Brady also serves as a senior member of the House Ways & Means Committee.   (*)

Australian Prime Minister warns asylum boat toll to rise in grim hunt


A boat full of refugees is smashed by violent seas off Australia's Christmas Island, as shown in this Channel 7 TV frame grab of a photo released by The West Australian. Hope dwindled for survivors of a refugee boat wreck off Australia Thursday which killed at least 28 people, including seven children. (AFP/The West Australian)


SYDNEY (KATAKAMI / AFP) – Hope dwindled for survivors of a refugee boat wreck off Australia Thursday which killed at least 28 people, including seven children, renewing debate on the plight of boat people travelling from Asia.

The wooden craft, crowded with up to 100 Iraqi, Kurdish and Iranian asylum seekers and their children, hit rocks at remote Christmas Island Wednesday and was shattered by huge waves as residents watched in horror.

Traumatised survivors pulled from the sea after the disaster huddled in a hospital and reception centre Thursday, with the most seriously injured flown to Perth as hope faded of finding their fellow passengers alive in wild seas.

"We have got to prepare ourselves for the likelihood that more bodies will be found and there has been further loss of life than we know now," warned Prime Minister Julia Gillard, who cut short her holiday to respond to the emergency.

Cyclonic conditions hampered search and rescue efforts which resumed at first light but yielded no further bodies or survivors by late Thursday, Customs said.

Home Affairs Minister Brendan O'Connor said 28 bodies had been recovered, including four infants, three children and nine women, underscoring "the tragedy that's occurred here".

Among the 42 survivors were eight children, one unaccompanied minor and three Indonesian crew, he added.
Immigration Minister Chris Bowen earlier said there had been between 70 and 100 people on board the leaky fishing boat, according to survivors, adding that the exact number of dead would "probably never" be known.
Medical personnel believe as many as 50 people may have perished on the jagged limestone outcrop, some 2,600 kilometres from Australia's mainland.

FILE : Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard
  "Yesterday we saw a truly horrific event, a terrible human tragedy on what is a very dangerous coastline at Christmas Island," said Gillard.

"I know the nation is shocked by what we have seen."

Gillard was forced to defend border police as questions mounted about how the boat managed to cross the most closely-watched people-smuggling corridor between Indonesia and Australia without being intercepted.

The prime minister said the boat had approached the island in predawn darkness and "extreme weather conditions" meant it was not detected "until seen from Christmas Island itself".

"In very rough and dangerous seas there is a limit to what can be achieved through radar and other surveillance mechanisms," Gillard said, adding there would be a criminal investigation as well as a coroner's probe.
Officials could not comment on the vessel's origin and said it was not being tracked because it was made of wood and was hard to detect.

Local police said they had received an emergency call from someone claiming to be on a boat with about 80 people -- believed to be the stricken vessel -- about 20 minutes after it was first sighted as it drifted after losing power.

Residents said they were woken at dawn Wednesday by the screams of victims, gathering life jackets and rushing to the cliffs to offer help, but were helpless as strong winds blew the flotation devices back onshore.
They watched in horror as the victims were crushed against limestone rocks, despite the efforts of navy rescuers to reach them in towering swells.

More than 5,000 asylum seekers from Iraq, Afghanistan and Sri Lanka have made their way to Australia this year, mostly on unseaworthy vessels from Indonesia, prompting criticism of Canberra for softening its refugee policy.


But lawyers and refugee advocates including Amnesty and the UNHCR said the tragedy highlighted the desperate plight of refugees and urged greater cooperation between nations for more humane solutions.
Survivors of the wreck were recovering Thursday in a hospital and a reception centre on Christmas Island, the site of Australia's main immigration detention centre for boat people.

Five seriously injured people were flown to the mainland for medical treatment.

Though they would be dealt with under normal immigration processes, Gillard said survivors would be given time to recover from their ordeal, and said the children and families would be allowed to live in the community instead of detention camps.

(*)

EU supports Palestinian Statehood





Please also visit : INDONESIAKATAKAMI.WORDPRESS.COM


December 16, 2010 (KATAKAMI / UK Embassy in Indonesia) --- The EU Foreign Affairs Council discussed the latest developments in the middle east on 13 December.

Expressing their regret that Israel had not extended the moratorium on settlement construction, European Governments reiterated their view on thekey parameters, principles and issues for the resolution of the Arab-Israel conflict, stating “the EU will not recognize any changes to the pre-1967 borders, including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties. This could include agreed territorial swaps. A way must be found through negotiations to resolve the status of Jerusalem as the future capital of two states. The EU calls for an agreed, just, fair and realistic solution to the refugee question. A negotiated settlement must allow the two States to live side by side in peace and security.”

The Council underlined the EU’s “readiness, when appropriate, to recognize a Palestinian state” and its welcome of the World Bank’s assessment that “if the Palestinian Authority maintains its current performance in institution building and delivery of public services, it is well positioned for the establishment of a State at any point in the near future”.

Council members also focused on the situation in Gaza, stating in its formal conclusion that “the EU remains extremely concerned by the prevailing situation” and calling for the “immediate, sustained and unconditional opening of crossings for the flow of humanitarian aid, commercial goods and persons to and from Gaza.” It was noted that “despite some progress following the decision of the Israeli government of 20 June 2010 to ease the closure, changes on the ground have been limited and insufficient so far. Further efforts and complementary measures are needed to achieve a fundamental change of policy that allows for the reconstruction and economic recovery of Gaza as well as improve the daily lives of the population while addressing Israel's legitimate security concerns.”

The Council also called on those holding the abducted Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit to release him without delay and for a complete stop of rocket attacks at Israel. (*)

Palestinian Authority cracks down on mosques to promote moderate Islam




Please also visit : INDONESIAKATAKAMI.WORDPRESS.COM 


December 15, 2010 EL BIREH, WEST BANK (KATAKAMI / THE WASHINGTON POST)  --- Each week, Mahmoud Habbash, the Palestinian Authority's minister of religious affairs, sends an e-mail to mosques across the West Bank. It contains what amounts to a script for the Friday sermon that every imam is required to deliver.

The practice, part of a broader crackdown on Muslim preachers considered too radical, shows the extreme steps the Palestinian Authority is taking to weaken Hamas, its Islamist rival, as it seeks to cement power and meet Israeli preconditions for peace talks.

The Palestinian policy drew little notice when it was launched last year. But it has been enforced with particular vigor in recent months and, analysts say, has been a factor in Hamas's declining strength in the West Bank.
Proponents say the tight control is necessary to curb fiery rhetoric, preserve Palestinian unity and promote a moderate form of Islam. But critics say the heavy-handed policy violates freedom of expression, alienates segments of Palestinian society and is a harbinger of the kind of police state the Palestinian Authority could become once statehood is achieved.

As Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas debates whether to continue negotiations with Israel or declare statehood unilaterally, he is also waging an internal battle for legitimacy against Hamas, which the United States and Israel consider a terrorist organization. Hamas won the last parliamentary elections in 2006, seized control of the Gaza Strip in a coup a year later and set up its own government there.

The firm grip on mosques is the latest element in a long effort to curb the strength of Hamas that has included widespread arrests and bans on Hamas media and gatherings. On Tuesday, when 70,000 people gathered in Gaza to mark the 23rd anniversary of the founding of Hamas, there were no rallies in the West Bank to mark the occasion.

The United States has pushed the Palestinian Authority to put an end to the vitriolic sermons that the United States and Israel say undercut peace efforts. But it has been careful not to overtly praise the latest effort. While seen as helpful to U.S. goals, the crackdown also reveals an authoritarian streak in a Palestinian leadership routinely hailed by American officials for its governance.

Such central government control of clerics is not uncommon in the Arab world. But it is disappointing to those who had expected greater tolerance from the Palestinian Authority, which rules parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

As part of its clampdown, the ministry has banned Hamas-affiliated imams from preaching. Those who are authorized to preach are paid by the Palestinian Authority.

"The Palestinian Authority's plan is to combat Islam and the religious trend within it," said Sheikh Hamid Bitawi, a well-known Islamic religious authority in Nablus who delivered sermons for four decades before the Palestinian Authority banned him three months ago.

Bitawi estimates that dozens of other imams have been prevented from preaching since the crackdown started, leading to a preacher shortage at many mosques. "I'm sure the popularity of Fatah [Abbas's party] and the Palestinian Authority is going down," Bitawi said. "They will be punished for their behavior."
'In our national interest'

The mosque policy was orchestrated by Habbash, who, following his appointment as minister of religious affairs in May 2009, placed all of the West Bank's 1,800 mosques under his supervision. Before that, imams were sometimes accused of delivering sermons that were hostile not only to Israel and to Jews, but to Abbas.
"We're convinced this is in our national interest," Habbash said in an interview at the newly renovated ministry office in El Bireh, adjacent to Ramallah, the seat of Abbas's power in the West Bank. "What we have seen is when mosques are under the control of other parties, it causes division within our people," Habbash said, adding that hundreds of mosques had been controlled by Palestinian militant groups, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

After taking control of the mosques, Habbash ordered the mandatory sermons. An imam can add to the sermon, Habbash said, "but of course he has to report on this."

On a recent Friday, the mandated sermon topic was the prophet Muhammad's 7th-century flight to Medina. If compulsory Koran passages are not delivered, security services report the offending imam back to Habbash, who reviews weekly reports on mosque activity.

Habbash also forces imams to rotate from mosque to mosque to prevent what he calls "ideological thought control."

In addition, the Palestinian Authority is training a new generation of imams at its government-funded Islamic college in the West Bank city of Qalqilyah. On a recent school day, students in one classroom of the soon-to-be-expanded single-story building were being taught how to distinguish Muhammad's true teachings from those falsely attributed to him.

'We need to liberate Islam'

Nasser Abed El-Al, who prays daily at the mosque in Qalqilyah, hasn't liked the changes. "They're choosing imams that speak the way they do," said Abed El-Al, who runs a kebab restaurant. "This regime is not popular with the people here."

An October poll by the Ramallah-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research found that just 30 percent of Palestinians say people in the West Bank can criticize the Palestinian Authority without fear, compared to 56 percent three years ago.

The mosque crackdown comes as Israel and watchdog groups step up monitoring of statements in Palestinian government-run media and educational materials that dispute Israel's right to exist or demonize Jews. For their part, Palestinian leaders routinely complain about statements by Israeli political or religious figures that are hostile to Arabs, which they say undercut peace efforts.

Habbash insists his goal is to advance Palestinian unity, not to appease the United States or Israel. So far, the Palestinian Authority has focused most of its attention on the mosques and responded quickly when it sees a problem.

After an imam urged Muslims to kill Jews in a sermon broadcast on a Palestinian government-run television station earlier this year, U.S. officials complained. Habbash apologized, said the imam had been a last-minute substitute, and ordered the following Friday's sermon at all mosques to be about tolerance among followers of Islam, Judaism and Christianity.

Habbash, 47, taught Islamic law and wrote a newspaper column before being forced to flee the Gaza Strip after Hamas seized control of the territory in 2007. Today, he is one of the government ministers closest to Abbas. His policy also makes him one of the most endangered: While most ministers travel with just two bodyguards, he has six.

"My main message is, we need to liberate Islam from this madness, from this extremism and wrong understanding of Islam," he said. "Islam does not incite to hate."

Khalil Shikaki, chief pollster at the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, said the overall crackdown on Hamas, including the mosque policy, has clearly weakened Hamas in the West Bank. "They have no media - no newspapers or magazines" in the West Bank, he said. "No doubt they have lost the mosques as a key platform."

The crackdown up close

Worshipers at the Great Mosque in Doura, near the city of Hebron, saw the crackdown up close one Friday in August. Witnesses said hundreds of Palestinian police forces prevented Sheikh Nayef Rajoub, the mosque's imam for 29 years, from delivering a sermon.

Rajoub was among the several dozen Hamas-affiliated politicians who were elected to parliament in 2006 and arrested by Israel a few months later, after Hamas militants captured Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier.

When Rajoub was released from an Israeli jail this summer after 50 months of imprisonment, the authority banned him from preaching.

"What happened to me was part of a general policy of the Palestinian Authority to prevent the representatives of the Palestinian people from speaking directly to their audience," Rajoub said in an interview at his office last month.

He was rearrested by Israel in early December for "being a senior Hamas activist who endangers the security of the area," according to the military, and sentenced to six months of administrative detention.

"This is a mouth-muzzling policy on the part of the Palestinian Authority," Rajoub said in the interview, before his most recent arrest. "This policy is aimed at curbing freedom of expression."  (*)

Obama administration sues BP, others over Gulf spill


Fire boat response crews battle the blazing remnants of the off shore oil rig Deepwater Horizon, off Louisiana, in this April 21, 2010 handout, file photograph. REUTERS/U.S. Coast Guard/Handout/Files
December 15, 2010 (KATAKAMI / Reuters) - The Obama administration on Wednesday launched a legal battle against BP Plc and its partners by suing them for the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history, which could cost the companies billions of dollars.

The lawsuit seeks damages from the well owners BP, Anadarko Petroleum Corp and Mitsui & Co Ltd unit MOEX, and well driller Transocean Ltd and its insurer QBE Underwriting/Lloyd's Syndicate 1036, part of Lloyds of London, for their roles in the Gulf of Mexico disaster.

"While today's civil action marks a critical step forward, it is not a final step," U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder told reporters at a news conference.

"Both our criminal and civil investigations are continuing, and our work to ensure that the American taxpayers are not forced to bear the costs of restoring the Gulf area -- and its economy -- goes on," he said.

The suit, the first by the U.S. government after the April 20 explosion aboard the drilling rig in which 11 workers died, was filed in a New Orleans federal court which is considering private lawsuits against BP and the others for the spill.

BP, which returned to profitability in the third quarter of 2010, has begun selling assets and amassing a massive warchest to pay for damages caused by the oil spill, which the oil concern has estimated could reach as much as $40 billion.

The oil company said on Wednesday it was weighing the sale of its Canadian natural-gas liquids business.
In response to the lawsuit, BP said it is "solely a statement of the government's allegations and does not in any manner constitute any finding of liability or any judicial finding that the allegations have merit."

"BP will answer the government's allegations in a timely manner and will continue to cooperate with all government investigations and inquiries," the company said.


US President Barack Obama (Getty Images)
SETTLEMENT IS A POSSIBILITY

Legal experts have said they expect the two sides to settle eventually but it could take years. In comparison, Exxon XOM.N> settled government claims over the spill by its Valdez tanker in Alaska in 1991, two years after the oil hit the coast.

The lawsuit against BP and others warned that "the full extent of potential injuries, destruction, loss and loss of services is not yet fully known and may not be fully known for many years."

Shares in the companies targeted in the lawsuit fell in the wake of the lawsuit.

The stocks trimmed early losses to close off their lows, with BP down 1.3 percent at $43.86 and Anadarko Petroleum down 2.3 percent at $67.41. Halliburton, which wasn't named in the suit, closed near session lows, down 3.1 percent at $39.79.

The Deepwater Horizon drilling rig blowout spilled about 4.9 million barrels of oil over several months. It fouled resort beaches and fishing grounds and led to hundreds of lawsuits over lost revenues and wages.
"This is about getting a fair deal for the region that suffered enormous consequences from this disaster," said Lisa Jackson, head of the Environmental Protection Agency.

The lawsuit accused the companies of violating safety and operating regulations in the period leading up to the disaster, including keeping the well under control, failing to use the best available and safest drilling technology and failing to maintain continuous surveillance of the well.

The government claimed the companies violated the U.S. Clean Water Act and the Oil Pollution Act, but the lawsuit does not request a specific dollar amount for damages.

For every barrel of oil spilled into the Gulf of Mexico, there could be a fine of up to $4,300 if gross negligence is found. That would equal a fine of at least $21 billion. If no gross negligence is found, the fine could be up to $1,100 per barrel or almost $5.4 billion.

It will be up to the judge to weigh the evidence presented in court to determine if the defendants were grossly negligent in their conduct, a Justice Department official said.

The Justice Department could also seek additional fines for harm to any animals protected by the Endangered Species Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, among other environmental laws.

The lawsuit did not name Halliburton, which did the cementing for the well, or Cameron International which provided well equipment, but Justice Department officials made it clear more defendants and charges could be added later.

BP HAS TAKEN RESPONSIBILITY

BP has taken responsibility for the cleanup but has questioned government estimates of how much oil came out of the well. BP co-owned the Macondo well with Anadarko and MOEX.

After the lawsuit was filed, its partners said the blame and liability laid squarely on BP.

Anadarko said it was not responsible for the decisions and operation for the well and therefore BP should be held responsible. Transocean, which drilled the well, also tried to pin the blame on BP.

"The responsibility for hydrocarbons discharged from a well lies solely with its owner and operator," Transocean said in a statement, adding it was "indemnified in this matter."

BP has estimated it may cost as much as $40 billion to pay for the spill, including the cleanup and penalties. The London-based oil firm has been selling numerous assets to raise as much as $30 billion to cover those costs.

The Justice Department asked a federal judge in New Orleans overseeing the litigation to hold the companies liable, except for Lloyds, for unlimited damages, beyond the $75 million cap under the Oil Pollution Act.

The judge in Louisiana, Carl Barbier, has been overseeing the hundreds of private lawsuits involving thousands of plaintiffs against BP and its partners. He has a status hearing set for Friday.

A lawyer for private individuals suing BP over the spill said the new lawsuit by the Obama administration would not hurt their efforts.

"We look forward to continued cooperation with the U.S. government in pursuit of justice for all victims of the Deepwater Horizon tragedy," said the lawyer Steve Herman. "(I) think it demonstrates confidence and momentum in the Court proceedings as we approach the February 2012 trial."   (*)

MS

Photostream : British Prime Minister David Cameron meets Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban


British Prime Minister David Cameron (L) greets the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban outside number 10 Downing Street on December 15, 2010 in London, England. During the final session of Prime Minister's Questions before the Christmas break, Mr Cameron claimed to be confident of maintaining his pre-election pledge to increase spending on the NHS every year. An upward revision of inflation figures by the Office for Budget Responsibility has resulted in the Government's NHS budget, representing a real-terms cut in investment. (Photo by Oli Scarff/Getty Images)

British Prime Minister David Cameron (R) speaks to the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban inside number 10 Downing Street on December 15, 2010 in London, England. During the final session of Prime Minister's Questions before the Christmas break, Mr Cameron claimed to be confident of maintaining his pre-election pledge to increase spending on the NHS every year. An upward revision of inflation figures by the Office for Budget Responsibility has resulted in the Government's NHS budget, representing a real-terms cut in investment. (Photo by Andy Rain - Pool/Getty Images)

Britain's Prime Minster David Cameron (R) speaks to Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban, in 10 Downing Street in central London December 15, 2010. REUTERS/Andy Rain/Pool

Russian President congratulated Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) personnel on the agency’s 90th anniversary



At a ceremony marking the Foreign Intelligence Service’s 90th anniversary.
Please also visit : INDONESIAKATAKAMI.BLOGSPOT.COM


December 15, 2010 (KATAKAMI / KREMLIN.RU) --- President Dmitry Medvedev congratulated Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) personnel on the agency’s 90th anniversary, presented its head, Mikhail Fradkov, with the Honorary Certificate of the Commander in Chief, and presented state decorations to a number of SVR officers.




* * *

Russia's President Dmitry Medvedev (L) hands an anniversary diploma over to the head of the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) Mikhail Fradkov during the ceremony to mark the 90th anniversary of SVR in Moscow, December 15, 2010. Medvedev praised the efficiency of SVR on Wednesday, months after it was embroiled in an espionage drama resulting in the biggest spy swap since the Cold War. ( Photo : Kremlin.Ru)




PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA DMITRY MEDVEDEV :  Friends, I want to congratulate all of you on the Foreign Intelligence Service’s 90th anniversary.

The film that we just watched began with the words “And so it will remain as long as our Motherland needs a foreign intelligence service,” and ended with the assertion that this will always be the case. I think this assertion is absolutely correct.

If we look at the world without illusions about humanity’s development, it is clear that the intelligence service will always be an important state institution no matter what the situation, political regime, or leadership in place. The intelligence service’s missions remain essentially unchanged. Methods and people change, directors come and go, but the tasks and missions remain. This is cause for neither sadness nor surprise, but is simply the way our world is.

Our foreign intelligence service, if we take its development from the start of the Soviet period, has gone through many stages in its evolution and is today one of the strongest and most competitive in the world. I think this is something that not only we here in this hall or our country’s people know, but something that our partners and our potential competitors also realise.




The service’s task now is to preserve these qualities in the face of the huge number of global challenges before us today. We all know these challenges. They include international terrorism, drug trafficking, global competition on international markets, cybercrime, and a mass of new threats not yet so clearly defined. Although the intelligence service’s missions remain essentially the same as in the past, and I think this will be the case for a long time yet to come, its methods must continually improve and change.

The global information flow that has spread across our entire planet has substantially changed the way decisions are made and created new problems. Some of these problems have been evident over recent months. Is this a good or a bad thing? In some ways it is good, for the intelligence service at least.

It creates new analytical opportunities and the possibility of seeing how potential competitors view us. But at the same time, it also creates new difficulties. No one is guaranteed against these problems, and this is something you also need to take into account in your work.

This year is a big anniversary for the Foreign Intelligence Service, but it has not been an easy year. I think, however, that our service still has all the possibilities it needs for timely, professional, and most importantly, effective resolution of the tasks before it.

The tasks and duties of the state authorities, President and Government are to ensure decent living standards for those working in our foreign intelligence. This is a vital aspect for the service’s effective work, because no matter how exceptional its personnel often are in many ways, they are nonetheless ordinary people with ordinary needs such as home, their immediate environment, housing conditions, and wages. There is no getting away from these issues. Conviction and heroism will always play a part of course, but other basic motives must be satisfied too.

One other thing I wanted to say today is that the state must take a responsible attitude towards any of our citizens who end up in various, often complicated situations, and this applies fully to those who work for our Foreign Intelligence Service too. You can rest assured of this.

Friends, it is a real pleasure to be here today and congratulate you, although these kinds of congratulations are never particularly public in nature. But I want to express at least part of my congratulations with the media present. I want to inform everyone here that as Commander in Chief I have signed an Honorary Certificate that I present to the Foreign Intelligence Service for its work in defence of our country. I offer you my warmest congratulations on this.

I want to say too that I will present state decorations to a number of the service’s officers.  (*)
MS

Desember 15, 2010

Ironi Wikileaks, Obama Pantas Dikecam Terkait Bom Kuningan 2009



FILE : President Barack Obama
Densus Bukan Likuidasi Tapi Ganti Nama, Akal-Akalan Merengek Ke Amerika?


Jurus Mubazir Polri Soal Terorisme Lewat 3 Elemen Anti Teror Yakni BNPT, Densus & CRT


Mengecam Penyerbuan Densus Ke Bandara Polonia & Balada Post Power Syndrome Gories Mere


Diduga Noordin M. Top Atau Gories Mere Yang Kebelet Ingin Ngetop ?

Jakarta, 15/12/ 2010 (KATAKAMI) --- Berdasarkan bocoran data dari Situs WIKILEAKS, 4 hari sebelum terjadinya aksi terorisme yang meledakkan 2 hotel bintang lima di Jakarta yaitu Hotel JW Mariott dan Hotel Ritz Carlton tahun 2009 lalu, Kedutaan Besar Amerika Serikat di Jakarta (Indonesia) telah mengirimkan kawat diplomatik ke PEMERINTAH AMERIKA SERIKAT bahwa akan terjadi "SERANGAN TERORISME" pada tanggal 17 Juli 2009.

Wikileaks sendiri bukan membocorkan data-data fantasi tetapi MURNI membocorkan rahasia kawat-kawat diplomatik dari jaringan DEPARTEMEN LUAR NEGERI AMERIKA SERIKAT.

Artinya, Kedutaan Besar Amerika Serikat telah melaporkan kepada Presiden Barack Obama tentang "akan terjadinya aksi terorisme di Indonesia" pada tanggal 13 Juli 2009.

Ledakan bom itu sendiri terjadi pada jam 07.47 WIB dan 07.57 WIB pada hari Jumat, 17 Juli 2009.



(YOUTUBE) --- Ledakan Bom di Ritz Carlton and Marriott Hotels in Mega Kuningan Jakarta (17 Juli 2009)


(YOUTUBE) The time of explosion ( Detik-detik waktu ledakan bom ) JW Marriott by.CCTV Eksklusif RCTI (17 Juli 2009)


Khusus di video ini yaitu sebelum penyiar RCTI berbicara, pada 3 detik pertama terdengar nama "PETRUS" disebut yaitu :  " .... pemilihan, Petrus ?"
Dijawab oleh lawan bicaranya : "Hmmmm"


(YOUTUBE) Terror Bom di JW marriott dan Ritz Carlton, Mega Kuningan Jakarta. Siaran dari SCTV (17 Juli 2009)


FILE : President Barack Obama



Kemudian Yang Mulia Presiden Barack Obama --- yang nota bene mewakili Pemerintah Amerika Serikat yang secara "teori" sudah lebih dulu mengetahui aksi terorisme itu 4 hari sebelumnya --- menelepon dengan sangat dramatis kepada Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono pada tanggal 18 Juli 2009.

Menurut pemberitaan DETIK.COM tertanggal 18 Juli 2009, Presiden Amerika Serikat (AS) Barack Obama menelepon Presiden SBY. Obama membicarakan pengeboman di Hotel JW Marriott dan Ritz Carlton. Obama menyampaikan bela sungkawa sekaligus dukungannya bagi Indonesia dalam perang melawan terorisme.

"Presiden Obama berbicara dengan Presiden Indonesia Yudhoyono hari ini untuk memberi selamat atas keterpilihannya kembali sebagai presiden dan menyampaikan dukungan dan solidaritas AS kepada pemerintah dan rakyat Indonesia menyusul serangan teroris di Jakarta," demikian pernyataan Gedung Putih seperti dikutip dari AFP, Sabtu (18/7/2009).
Obama juga memuji Indonesia yang telah menggelar pemilu dengan sukses dan bisa menjadi teladan bagi negara-negara Islam. Ini membuktikan bahwa Islam, demokrasi, dan keragaman bisa hidup berdampingan dan tumbuh bersama.

"Presiden juga meneguhkan kembali kerja sama antara AS dengan Indonesia dalam melawan ekstremisme di Asia Tenggara dan seluruh dunia," lanjut pernyataan Gedung Putih. Demikian diberitakan DETIK.COM yang mengutip Kantor Berita AFP.


FOTO : Ponimin, Ponimin dikenal warga lereng Merapi sebagai orang pintar kedua setelah Mbah Maridjan. Dia biasa dimintai tolong warga untuk menentukan hari baik, mengusir setan, dan juga menjadi pawang hujan. Empat hari sebelum turunnya awan panas yang menewaskan Mbah Maridjan dan puluhan korban lainnya, Ponimin sudah mendapat "informasi".

Ilustrasi yang paling dicocok untuk digambarkan mengenai posisi Presiden Barack Obama yang sudah diberitahu 4 hari sebelum aksi peledakan bom itu adalah kejadian gaib yang terjadi seputar letusan Gunung Merapi pada bulan Oktober 2010 lalu.

Ini hanya sebatas ILUSTRASI tetapi pantas dikemukakan sebagai "gambaran" yang bertujuan untuk menyindir tentang "luasnya pengetahuan" Pemerintah Amerika Serikat mengenai urusan domestik negara lain, termasuk rencana aksi terorisme yang belum terjadi.

Empat hari sebelum turunnya WEDHUS GEMBEL atau awan panas yang menewaskan kuncen Gunung Merapi Mbah Maridjan dan puluhan korban lainnya, Ponimin sudah mendapatkan informasi informal mengenai BENCANA MEMATIKAN itu.

Seperti yang diberitakan DETIK.COM tanggal 29 Oktober 2010, Ponimin mengaku ditemui 'penguasa' Merapi atau makhluk gaib penunggu Merapi beberapa hari sebelum musibah awan panas terjadi. Sosok lelaki tua berbaju lurik dan berblangkon khas Jawa itu meminta Ponimin membuat bubur merah dan putih.

"Sabtu 23 Oktober pagi, saya didatangi si Mbah. Dia bilang mau menghancurkan lereng Merapi di empat penjuru, menggunakan kekuatan api, air, tanah, dan angin," cerita Ponimin saat ditemui wartawan di rumah dr Ana Ratih Wardani, di Kaliadem, Umbulharjo, Cangkringan, Sleman, Jumat (29/10/2010).

Namun si Mbah berjanji tidak akan menghancurkan tanah di sekitar Merapi asalkan Ponimin maum membuat bubur merah dan putih. Namun bubur itu bukanlah bubur biasa. Air pembuat bubur harus diambil dari 7 mata air yang berbeda.

"Kata si Mbah kalau mau selamat mesti membuat sesajen bubur merah dan putih yang airnya harus dari 7 mata air. Kemudian bubur harus didoakan doa nurbuat dan selamat," kata pria 50 tahun ini.

Ponimin mengaku, ini bukan kali pertamanya si Mbah menemuinya. Sosok gaib itu sudah mulai 'dikenalnya' sejak 1994. Demikian diberitakan DETIK.COM.


FILE : Hotel Ritz Carlton yang ikut diledakkan oleh serangan aksi TERORISME pada tanggal 17 Juli 2009. Berdasarkan bocoran kawat diplomatik yang disebarkan WIKILEAKS, KEDUTAAN BESAR AMERIKA SERIKAT di INDONESIA sudah melaporkan tentangan rencana serangan aksi terorisme ini melalui kawat diplomatiknya 4 hari sebelum ledakan itu terjadi.


Mengapa judul tulisan ini memakai kata MENGECAM ?

Tentu saja harus dikecam.

Bayangkan, ada sebuah negara SUPER POWER yang sudah tahu tentang rencana aksi terorisme di Indonesia tetapi mendiamkan saja.

Bayangkan, ada dokumen rahasia tentang aksi serangan terorisme yang akan menghantam, mengguncang dan menghancurkan Indonesia dilaporkan oleh KEDUTAAN AMERIKA kepada Pemerintah AMERIKA SERIKAT ( cq Presiden Barack Obama dan Menteri Luar Negeri Hillary Clinton) sebelum aksi itu terjadi ( dan hebatnya didiamkan saja oleh negara yang sudah mengetahui aksi serangan terorisme itu ).

Bayangkan, betapa hebatnya POLISI ( cq TIM ANTI TEROR INDONESIA ) yang patut dapat diduga sudah bisa mendapat rinciran serangan aksi terorisme terkait Bom Kuningan 2009.

Sebab pertanyaannya, darimana KEDUTAAN BESAR AMERIKA SERIKAT di Jakarta ini bisa mendapat dokumen dan informasi akurat tentangan serangan aksi terorisme itu secara detail ? Dari TIM ANTI TEROR POLRI-kah atau dari Jaringan Teroris itu senditi ?

Yang lebih pantas lagi dkutuk, setelah BOM meledak tanggal 17 Juli 2009 lalu, Barack Obama dengan “manisnya” bisa menelpon Presiden SBY untuk menyatakan belasungkawa.
Manisnya mulutmu dan kata-katamu, Obama.

Tidak malukah engkau hei Obama, kepada rakyat Indonesia, kepada Pemerintah Selandia Baru, Australia dan Belanda, yang warga negaranya ikut TEWAS dalam serangan aksi terorisme ini ?

Korban tewas dalam BOM KUNINGAN 2009 itu adalah :

INDONESIA 3 orang yaitu : Evert Mokodompis - Chef Banquet JW Marriot, plus 2 orang pelaku bom sendiri atas nama Dani Dwi Permana dan Nana Ikhwan Maulana.

SELANDIA BARU 1 orang atas nama Timothy MacKay selaku Presiden Direktur Holcim Indonesia.

AUSTRALIA 3 orang yaitu atas nama Nathan Verithy, Craig Sanger dan John Gear Rufer McEvoy.

BELANDA 2 orang yaitu atas nama EJC Keaning dan Pieter Burer.



FILE : President Barack Obama
Indonesia tidak membutuhkan “SENYUM MANIS” Barack Obama.

Indonesia membutuhkan Amerika sebagai mitra strategis yang konsisten membuktikan kata-katanya bahwa mereka siap menjalin dan membantu Indonesia dalam penanganan terorisme.

Berdasarkan pembocoran kawat diplomatik Kedutaan Amerika Serikat tentang BOM KUNINGAN 2009 yang dimuat oleh WIKILEAKS ini, Amerika sudah tahu 4 hari sebelum aksi serangan terorisme itu terjadi.

Mengapa didiamkan ?

Untuk apa Amerika membuang uang membentuk dan membidani lahirnya Detasemen Khusus 88 Anti Teror kalau dalam waktu 4 hari sebelum aksi serangan terorisme itu terjadi, Densus 88 tidak bisa mencegah dan mengagalkannya ?

Apakah Amerika mempunyai Undang Undang yang bisa menghukum para diplomat (bahkan presidennya) jika mereka membiarkan dan mendiamkan sebuah kejahatan terorisme terjadi ?

Ada unsur PEMBIARAN telah terjadi secara menyakitkan dalam kasus Bom Kuningan 2009 ini.

Ada unsur PEMBIARAN yang telah merenggut nyawa 9 0rang (ditambah 2 pelaku peledakan bom itu).

Satu nyawapun sangat berharga didalam kehidupan ini.

Hak hidup manusia seakan telah dirampas oleh arogansi kedigdayaan Amerika.

Untuk apa membocorkan sebuah serangan aksi terorisme yang akan terjadi di sebuah negara, kalau Amerika tidak berperan serta dalam mencegah dan menggagalkan aksi kemanusiaan itu ?

Untuk apa Presiden Barack Obama menelepon Presiden SBY beberapa jam setelah aksi peledakan bom itu terjadi guna menawarkan bantuan dan kerjasama dalam memerangi terorisme ?

Hei Barack Obama, jawab dulu pertanyaan ini ?


Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono menggelar jumpa pers beberapa jam setelah terjadinya peledakan bom Kuningan 2009 didampingi Kepala Badan Intelijen Negara Sjamsir Siregar (paling kiri) dan Menkopolhukkam Widodo AS (berbusana batik) dan Kapolri Jenderal Bambang Hendarso Danuri ( tidak tampak di gambar). Dalam jumla pers ini, SBY menuding ada unsur politis di balik peledakan bom itu. Sementara berdasarkan kawat diplomatik Kedutaan Besar Amerika yang dibocorkan WIKILEAKS, Pemerintah Amerika sudah mengetahui aksi serangan terorisme itu 4 hari sebelum bom itu terjadi.

Sulit bagi siapapun menuding muka TIM ANTI TEROR INDONESIA sebagai dalang pembocoran dokumen dan informasi tentang rencana serangan teroris tanggal 17 Juli 2009 sehingga Kedutaan Besar Amerika di Jakarta bisa mengetahuinya 4 hari sebelumnya.

Sulit membuat asumsi atau analisa yang akurat karena segala sesuatu harus berdasarkan nalar, akal sehat dan informasi hitam diatas putih.

Tetapi betapa memalukannya diri kalian, hei DENSUS 88 ANTI TEROR, lagak kalian sangat memuakkan dan pantas dihujat oleh rakyat Indonesia.

Sebuah aksi serangan terorisme sudah bisa dilaporkan oleh Kedutaan Asing kepada Pemerintahnya dengan sangat akurat, tetapi malangnya TIM ANTI TEROR di Indonesia seakan “sedang tidur” sebelum serangan itu terjadi.

Setelah BOM MELEDAK, barulah kalian keluar kandang dengan garang dan sok gagah berani menggasak pihak-pihak yang kalian tuding sebagai TERORIS.
Dimana letak rasionalitas dari semua benang merah ini ?

Hei Bung, begitu banyak keluarga yang masih merasakan pedihnya kehilangan orang-orang yang mereka cintai yang tewas akibat kebiadaban aksi terorisme pada BOM KUNINGAN 2009 itu.

Yang pantas dipertanyakan, itu aksi terorisme atau aksi-aksian terorisme ?
Itu memang perbuatan teroris atau teroris-terorisan ?

Tidak letak kewibawaan Pemerintah Indonesia terkait bocornya kawat diplomatik Kedutaan Besar Amerika terkait BOM KUNINGAN ini ?
Anda, Presiden SBY, lebih hebring lagi.

Bisa-bisanya juga anda ngoceh beberapa jam setelah BOM KUNINGAN 2009 itu bahwa patut dapat diduga ada unsur politis dibalik BOM itu.

Aduh SBY, coba lihat video rekaman anda berpidato soal BOM KUNINGAN 2009 yang berisi tudingan anda kepada pihak tertentu di dalam negeri.

Anda tidak tahu malu menuding orang sembarangan.

Empat hari sebelum aksi peledakan bom itu terjadi, PRESIDEN NEGARA SUPER POWER di dunia ini sudah mendapatkan laporan lengkap tentang aksi serangan terorisme alias BOM KUNINGAN 2009 itu.

Jadi apa fungsi Presiden di negara ini kalau tidak bisa melindungi rakyatnya sendiri dan warga negara asing yang sedang berada di Indonesia ?


FILE : President Barack Obama
Sehingga yang perlu disampaikan disini adalah kesungguhan Pemerintah Amerika Serikat dalam menjalin hubungan kerjasama dengan negara lain dimanapun juga, termasuk Indonesia.

Terutama Presiden Barack Obama, janganlah memamerkan senyum manis dan kata-kata yang membuai tentang tawaran kerjasama dalam memerangi terorisme tetapi dalam kehidupan nyata, yang terjadi justru sebaliknya.

Informasi WIKILEAKS tentang Bom Kuningan ini sangat menyakitkan hati.

Terorisme seakan menjadi panggung sandiwara yang pantas untuk dibiarkan memberangus nyawa sebanyak-banyaknya.

Terorisme seakan menjadi drama kemanusiaan yang tidak perlu dicegah dan digagalkan demi AKSI HEROISME dari Tim Anti Teror Indonesia yang selama ini sangat suka jual omongan tentang keberhasilan memerangi terorisme.

Tutup mulut kalian, DENSUS !

Data WIKILEAKS itu sangat memalukan dan mujarab untuk menghancurkan kesombongan kalian yang selama ini tidak pernah mau bekerjasama dengan instansi lain dalam memerangi terorisme.

Kecil kemungkinan TNI akan mau melakukan PEMBIARAN jika mereka tahu bahwa empat hari kemudian akan ada sebuah aksi serangan terorisme di Indonesia.

Satu hal yang paling penting untuk digaris-bawahi mengenai KEAMANAN NASIONAL atau NATIONAL SECURITY bahwa dibutuhkan koordinasi yang sangat kuat antar aparat keamanan dalam memerangi terorisme.

Terorisme bukan komoditi dagang atau skenario indah yang bisa dilahap negara manapun untuk menyetir unsur-unsur keamanan di Indonesia.

Terorisme bukan "mainan" yang asyik dan sangat enak diutak-atik oleh negara manapun yang seakan bisa melakukan apa saja, termasuk menyaksikan kehancuran Indonesia yang sengaja dibiarkan digempur oleh kejahatan terorisme itu sendiri.

Siapa sebenarnya "THE REAL TERRORIST" yang menjadi biang kerok dari semua aksi terorisme di negara ini ?

Memalukan sekali, ada aksi terorisme yang sengaja dibiarkan dan tidak digagalkan oleh TIM ANTI TEROR INDONESIA.

Kalian ibarat duri yang menusuk sendi-sendi kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara di Indonesia.

Sedihnya hati rakyat Indonesia menyaksikan kejahatan kemanusiaan yang bernama terorisme itu.

Dan bocornya data serangan terorisme terkait BOM KUNINGAN 2009 ini 4 hari sebelumnya, mengingatkan kejadian yang "SERUPA TAPI TAK SAMA" pada aksi serangan terorisme di Hotel yang sama yaitu JW MARIOTT pada bulan Agustus 2003.

Sumber KATAKAMI.COM dari kalangan perwira tinggi Polri menceritakan bahwa Komisaris Jenderal Gories Mere sudah mengetahui rencana aksi serangan terorisme di  Hotel JW Mariott itu beberapa hari sebelumnya.

Rencana aksi itu dilaporkan kepada Kapolri Jenderal Dai Bachtiar tetapi Sang Kapolri tidak percaya.

Detik-detik menjelang bom itu meledak, Gories Mere dan seorang perwira  tinggi dari Tim Anti Teror Polri makan di sebuah Kafe untuk menantikan saat-saat peledakan bom itu terjadi.

Duarrrrrrrrr !

Saat bom itu meledak, Gories Mere sedang asyik menikmati menu makanan yang lezat di Kafe itu tanpa ekspresi.

Inilah gambaran manusia yang biadab dan tidak tahu malu.

Dia sudah tahu akan ada serangan aksi terorisme tetapi melakukam pembiaran ( dan malah sengaja mencari restoran yang nyaman untuk menikmati santapan lezat saat bom meledak ).

Penyanyi KAKA dari Grup Band SLANK mengekspresikan keprihatinannya atas terjadinya Bom Kuningan 2009 dengan menunjukkan celana yang dipakai bertuliskan : "BOMBERS KISS MY .... ASS !" yang berarti : Hei, Pelaku Bom, Cium Nih PANTAT Gue !
Wikileaks adalah sebuah ironi yang hadir di permukaan dunia ini untuk mengusik bahkan mencabik-cabik perasaan bagi negara atau pemimpin dunia mana saja yang tersenggol dalam kawat-kawat diplomatik jaringan Kedutaan Amerika di dunia.

Wikileaks adalah sebuah ironi yang menggambarkan betapa arogannya Amerika terhadap negara manapun didunia ini.

Siapa saja bisa diejek.

Siapa saja bisa dihina.

Siapa saja bisa dikatai.

Dan siapa saja bisa dibuai dengan kata-kata indah tentang kebaikan Amerika bekerjasama dalam memerangi aksi terorisme (terutama dalam masa pemerintahan Presiden Barack Obama).


Padahal faktanya : OMONG KOSONG LU, "BARRY" (OBAMA)  !


Anda tidak lebih istimewa dari omong kosong apapun juga didunia ini sebab melakukan pembiaran terhadap kejahatan kemanusiaan yang bernama TERORISME adalah wujud dari AROGANSI yang paling arogan.


Mengerti, Mr Arrogant ?


Payah Lu !


Jangan banyak obral senyum lagi kepada dunia internasional sebab hidup ini harus dihargai secara tulus, jujur dan penuh moralitas bagi setiap insannya yang taat beragama.


Darimana ceritanya anda hei AMERIKA, mau bekerjasama dengan dunia Islam (termasuk Indonesia) kalau kejahatan TERORISME saja kalian biarkan terjadi.


Aduh. Gila betul ....


(*)